Heh, nice work. But I am not sure it was bad faith. It is consistent with bad faith, but there is another alternative explanation. Confirmation bias. I'd guess it never occurred to the Media Matters analyst to even check other outlets to do a comparison. I'd guess he found a pattern that fit his cynical view of Fox, and ran with it, without considering alternatives. I think it was Heinlein who said something like never attribute to malice that which is equally explained by incompetence. It does not make it any better, or the story any less pernicious. Of course, I do not have evidence that it is confirmation bias rather than bad faith. And I am not sure how one might tease them out in this type of situation.

Expand full comment